Supplementary Provisions on Interpretation II of SPC on Several Issues concerning Application of Marriage Law of China
2018-05-03 1069
Supplementary Provisions on the Interpretation II of the Supreme People's Court on Several Issues concerning the Application of the Marriage Law of the People's Republic of China
· Document Number：Interpretation No. 6 [2017] of the Supreme People's Court
· Area of Law： Marriage,Family Support,Adoption,and Inheritance
· Level of Authority： Judicial Interpretation
· Date issued：02-28-2017
· Effective Date：03-01-2017
· Status： Effective
· Issuing Authority： Supreme People's Court
Announcement of the Supreme People's Court
The Supplementary Provisions on the Interpretation II of the Supreme People's Court on Several Issues concerning the Application of the Marriage Law of the People's Republic of China, as adopted at the 1,710th Session of the Judicial Committee of the Supreme People's Court on February 20, 2017, are hereby issued, and shall come into force on March 1, 2017.
Supreme People's Court
February 28, 2017
Supplementary Provisions on the Interpretation II of the Supreme People's Court on Several Issues concerning the Application of the Marriage Law of China
(Interpretation No. 6 [2017] of the Supreme People's Court, deliberated and adopted at the 1,710th Session of the Judicial Committee of the Supreme People's Court on February 20, 2017, and coming into force on March 1, 2017)
In Article 24 of the Supplementary Provisions on the Interpretation II of the Supreme People's Court on Several Issues concerning the Application of the Marriage Law of China, two paragraphs are added respectively as paragraphs 2 and 3 thereof:
Where a third party claims rights over any debt fabricated by one spouse in collusion with the third party, the people's court shall not support the third party's claim.
Where a third party claims rights over any debt owed by one spouse when he or she commits any violation or crime, such as gambling and drug use, the people's court shall not support the third-party's claim.
