Several Provisions of Trial of Cases of Disputes over the Limitation of Liability for Maritime Claims
2018-08-05 1507
- Document Number:Announcement of
the Supreme People’s Court
- Area of Law: Maritime Litigation
- Level of Authority: Judicial Interpretation
- Date issued:08-27-2010
- Effective Date:09-15-2010
- Issuing Authority: Supreme People's Court
- Status: Effective
Announcement of the
Supreme People's Court
The Several Provisions of the Supreme People's Court on the Trial of Cases of
Disputes over the Limitation of Liability for Maritime Claims, which have been
adopted at the 1484th session of the Judicial Committee of the Supreme People's
Court on March 22, 2010, are hereby promulgated and shall come into force on
September 15, 2010.
August 27, 2010
Several Provisions of the Supreme People's Court on the Trial of Cases of
Disputes over the Limitation of Liability for Maritime Claims
(Interpretation No.11 [2010] of the Supreme People's Court)
In order to correctly try cases of disputes over the limitation of liability
for maritime claims, these Provisions are formulated in accordance with the
provisions of the Special Maritime Procedure Law of the
People's Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as the Special
Maritime Procedure Law) and the Maritime Law of
the People's Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as the
Maritime Law) and in light of the actual situation of the judicial work.
Article 1 The provisions of the Special Maritime
Procedure Law and the Maritime Law
shall be applied to the trial of cases of disputes over the limitation of
liability for maritime claims; if there is no provision in the Special Maritime Procedure Law and the Maritime Law, the provisions of other relevant
laws and administrative regulations shall apply.
Article 2 Where different liable parties in the same maritime accident apply to
different maritime courts for the establishment of the fund for limitation of
liability for maritime claims in accordance with the provisions of Article 102 of the Special Maritime Procedure Law before
filing a lawsuit, the maritime court which dockets the case later shall, in
accordance with the provisions of the Civil Procedure
Law, transfer it to the maritime court which dockets the case
earlier for jurisdiction.
Article 3 Where a liable party applies for the establishment of the fund for
limitation of liability for maritime claims in litigation, it shall file an
application with the maritime court which accepts the relevant maritime dispute
case.
If the relevant maritime dispute case is accepted by different maritime courts,
a liable party shall, in accordance with the jurisdiction agreement, file an
application for the establishment of the fund for limitation of liability for
maritime claims with the maritime court which first dockets the case; if no
jurisdiction agreement is concluded between the parties concerned, the
application shall be filed with the maritime court which dockets the case
first.
Article 4 Upon the establishment of the fund for limitation of liability for
maritime claims, the maritime court in which the fund has been established
shall have the jurisdiction over the lawsuit filed by the maritime claimant
against the liable party on the relevant disputes over the maritime accident.
Where a maritime claimant files a lawsuit with another maritime court, the
maritime court which accepts the case shall, in accordance with the provisions
of the Civil Procedure Law,
transfer the case to the maritime court in which the fund for limitation of
liability for maritime claims has been established, except when a jurisdiction
agreement has been concluded between the parties concerned.
Article 5 The fifteen-day period for the maritime court to make a ruling as
prescribed in Paragraph 2 of Article 106
of the Special Maritime Procedure Law
shall be calculated from the 30th day from the day after the date on which the
maritime court makes an announcement on the acceptance of the application for
the establishment of the fund for limitation of liability for maritime claims
for the last time.
Article 6 The expiry date of the application period for the registration of
creditor' rights as prescribed in Article 112
of the Special Maritime Procedure Law
shall be the 60th day from the day after the date on which the maritime court
makes an announcement on the acceptance of the application for the
establishment of the fund for limitation of liability for maritime claims for
the last time.
Article 7 Where a creditor's application for the registration of creditor's
rights meets the relevant provisions, the maritime court shall, upon the
establishment of the fund for limitation of liability for maritime claims, make
a ruling in accordance with the provisions of Article 114 of the Special Maritime Procedure Law; where the
fund for limitation of liability for maritime claims is not established
according to law, the maritime court shall make a ruling to terminate the
registration procedure of creditor's rights. The application fee paid by the
creditor shall be borne by the applicant who applies for the establishment of
the fund for limitation of liability for maritime claims.
Article 8 Upon the establishment of the fund for limitation of liability for
maritime claims, a maritime claimant may apply for preservation of the liable
party's property based on the maritime claims against which the liable party
can not defense by quoting the limitation of liability for maritime claims
according to law.
Article 9 Where, upon the establishment of the fund for limitation of liability
for maritime claims, a maritime claimant applies for detention of ships on the
ground of exercising maritime liens about the maritime claims arisen from the
same maritime accident which may be subject to limitation of liability as
prescribed in Article 207 of the Maritime Law, the people's court shall not
support such an application.
Article 10 Where a creditor, in accordance with the provisions of Article 209 of the Maritime Law, claims that the liable party is
not entitled to the limitation of liability when bringing a suit for
recognition of right, he shall file an application in written form. The
procedure of the recognition of right as prescribed in the Special Maritime Procedure Law shall not
be applied to the trial of the case, and the parties concerned may proceed with
an appeal against the judgment or ruling made by the maritime court according
to law.
Where more than two creditors claim that the liable party is not entitled to
the limitation of liability, the maritime court may try the relevant cases by
the principle of joinder.
Article 11 Where it needs to determine the proportion of degree of fault in
ship collisions after a creditor brings a suit for recognition of right in
accordance with the provisions of Paragraph 1 of Article 116 of the Special Maritime Procedure Law, the
procedure of recognition of right as prescribed in the Special Maritime Procedure Law shall not
be applied to the trial of the case, and the parties concerned may proceed with
an appeal against the judgment or ruling made by the maritime court according
to law.
Article 12 Ship operators as prescribed in Article 204
of the Maritime Law shall refer to registered
ship operators, or persons who accept the entrustment of the ship owners to
actually use and control the ships and to undertake responsibilities for the
ships, but not including non vessel operating common carrier business
operators.
Article 13 If a liable party does not apply for the establishment of the fund
for limitation of liability for maritime claims, it does not affect him in the
defense of the limitation of liability for maritime claims against the maritime
claims as prescribed in Article 207
of the Maritime Law in litigation.
Article 14 If a liable party does not defend on the limitation of liability for
maritime claims, the maritime court shall not initiatively make a ruling by
applying the provisions on the limitation of liability for maritime claims of
the Maritime Law.
Article 15 If a liable party does not defend on the limitation of liability for
maritime claims before the judgment of the first instance is made and the
defense is filed in the second instance or retrial, the people's court shall
not support such a defense.
Article 16 If a liable party does not defend on the limitation of liability for
maritime claims against the maritime claims as prescribed in Article 207 of the Maritime Law, and the creditor, in accordance
with the relevant effective judgment or arbitral award, applies for the
execution of the liable party's property other than the fund for limitation of
liability for maritime claims, the people's court shall support such an
application, except when the creditor applies for registration of creditor's
rights by taking the above legal instruments as evidence for creditor's rights
and is approved upon ruling of the maritime court.
Article 17 The maritime claims which may limit the liability as prescribed in Article 207 of the Maritime Law do not include the claims raised
from floating, removal, demolition or from making them harmless of the
submerged, wrecked, stranded or abandoned ships, or from removal, demolition or
from making them harmless of the cargo on board.
If a liable party is subject to the claims prescribed in the preceding
paragraph because of ship collisions and makes recourse against the opposite ship
on the losses caused therein, and the party against which the claim is filed
claims to limit the liability in accordance with the provisions of Article 207 of the Maritime Law, the people's court shall support
such a claim.
Article 18 The “liable party” as prescribed in Article 209 of the Maritime Law refers to the liable person
himself in a maritime accident.
Article 19 Where a maritime claimant, on the ground of the unseaworthiness of
the ship in a maritime accident, claims that the liable party is not entitled
to the limitation of liability, but can not prove that the losses which give
rise to the claims are resulted from the reckless act or omission of the liable
party himself done with the intent to cause such losses or with knowledge that
such losses would probably occur, the people's court shall not support such a
claim.
Article 20 The fund for limitation of liability for maritime claims shall be
established in RMB, and the amount thereof shall be calculated in terms of the
Special Drawing Rights to RMB conversion method on the effective date of the
ruling of the court on approving the establishment of the fund.
Article 21 The interest as prescribed in Article 213
of the Maritime Law shall be calculated in terms
of the benchmark interest rate in the same period of the one-year loan of the
financial institutions determined by the People's Bank of China from the date
of the occurrence of the maritime accident until the date of the establishment
of the fund.
Where the fund for limitation of liability for maritime claims is established
in the way of guarantee, the interest in the period of the establishment of the
fund shall be calculated in terms of the benchmark interest rate in the same
period of the one-year loan of the financial institutions determined by the
People's Bank of China.
Article 22 As to a case for which a final judgment has been made before these
Provisions come into force, if the people's court retries the case, these
Provisions shall not apply.
Article 23 Where there is any discrepancy between these Provisions and the
judicial interpretations made by this Court before these Provisions come into
force, these Provisions shall prevail.